Originally Posted by varepoman
i never said anything about what wasnt on the camaro it was refered to about my mustang ....and i never once told you it was a 306 and you cant show that anywhere ....regardless of anyone who thinks who is right or wrong all she was doing was informing the public that the mustang was not a 306 and you were misleading them and it was not by my doing...i made the trade in good faith as you did...you definitely got the better deal...live and learn. be a man and just move the f on....if you got a problem with it and want to call names like a second grader then go ahead...if you want to meet we can, whatever the case may be whats done is done...i will find out what the car will do hp wise tomorrow if its not over 500hp like you claimed oh welll...if it is then i will be the first to say i apologize....again she was correcting on the displacement of the mustang.....good luck on your sale or trade or what ever you are up to...
again i am telling you on a chassis dyno and with a NON-lockup convertorit wont dyno good. all of us know that.... i said the engine should be 550+ hp..... and it should be not 500. but not with a non lock up vertor and not on a chassis dyno....
but you got exactly what i said the car was and to say anything otherwise is just a plain lie.
and to be truthfull i didnt get the better end of things. i dont have a fresh 306 in the 89. i dont have my seats, i dont have a push pull, dont have a battery relocate, dont have a compucar nitrous bottle and i dont have a new clutch and worldclass 5 speed (but i do have a regular t5 that grinds going into reverse and leaks fluids). and well i do have the new clutch cause i put it in last week
And i gave up a camaro that just needed to be finished up like i stated from the begining that there is a good 20k tied into it
i got the raw end of it. but didnt complain like your girl and you did
have a nice life dude